Talk:Roper

I agree that classifying them as an Aberration makes more sense; however in DD Revisited p 51 they are clearly labeled as CE Large Magical Beasts. This may be an error on Paizo's part. ~LD~ 23:29, September 15, 2010 (UTC)

Dungeon Denizens Revisited was written using the older 3.5 rules, while the information stating that ropers are aberrations is from the Bestiary, which used the newer Pathfinder RPG rules. Even though both are Paizo publications, Pathfinder RPG always trumps 3.5 when describing the same thing. Any fluff information from that book is still viable, however, as is any crunch info that has not been republished using the newer rules set. --brandingopportunity 00:52, September 16, 2010 (UTC)

Okay. Thanks. ~LD~ 00:53, September 16, 2010 (UTC)

No worries, thanks for checking in about it. I get corrected on stuff all the time. --brandingopportunity 04:44, September 16, 2010 (UTC)