Help talk:Tutorial/Wrap-up

From PathfinderWiki

Inclusion initiatives

Is the Inner Sea World Guide Inclusion Initiative still active? It looks like it is complete. If it is, is there a preferred initiative to start with? I have the Lost Omens World Guide . Thank you! — ellep (talk) 04:40, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Another good spot, ellep. I've updated the page with some more Inclusion Initiatives, including a 2E one for the Bestiary. We almost certainly should have one for the Lost Omens World Guide too but, as yet, it has not been set up. However, just plough on please and add any material you want from the LOWG, it doesn't require an Inclusion Initiative. --Fleanetha (talk) 14:44, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
Thanks, that is good to know! Is there a category or some other way to see what articles need updating or are missing content from LOWG? — ellep (talk) 01:41, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello ellep. There is currently no LOWG Inclusion Initiative, though it might be useful to have one, it being pretty much the ISWG for 2e. You could make one, ellep, based on existing ones, if you wished. However, that's not necessary - you could just find areas not yet updated from the LOWG and dive in. I have not yet started any of the Lost Omens line, unfortunately, but, from what I have seen, I do wonder whether we should have Inclusion Initiatives for every book in the line, as they seem so rich with information this wiki needs. Also Bestiary 2 and Bestiary 3 will likely need them parallel to the Pathfinder Bestiary one. -Fleanetha (talk) 12:42, 28 December 2020 (UTC)