From PathfinderWiki

Unsightly Lists

The TOC for this article is monstrous. Also, the lists of districts and services don't adhere to the encyclopedic article structure that I think we're aiming for. The districts I think are an important thing to include, but should be made into a definitions list, similar to what was done on the Shoanti article for each quah, linking to a longer article on each one individually. I recognize the usefulness of the services portion to GMs, but it is such a long list without any detail on any of the listings that I can't imagine anyone actually finding it useful in the context of this article. How should we make this work? -- Yoda8myhead 03:07, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

I agree completely. There's no need for each district, each point of interest, to warrant it's own heading in this article. This is especially true when we consider how thoroughly these locations are detailed individually; there's enough information available to create articles on each of these sites. They may be shorter articles, but they'll definitely be more than stubs.
I think the only heading for such information should simply be an overall descriptive term. For example, we should keep the heading Districts, but under that I feel the individual districts should simply be bolded and linked to their own articles. A brief description can be added, but it probably shouldn't be any longer than a few sentences. -- Heaven's Agent 20:16, 29 June 2008 (UTC)