Talk:Reiko
Gender
I don't know if it's really important or relevant, but could we possibly change the title of the notes 1 and 2 from her gender? I already changed her gender but the note calls her agender still as the text that you click to go to the Paizo forum link (sorry if I'm woefully uninformed on terminology here, referring to the links near the bottom of the page both of which share the same name) even if just to keep people from confusing her as agender? I dunno, might just be worth it to have accurately named notes/links, because the post it jumps to even says asexual. - CaptainZulas (talk) 10:04, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
- I've changed it to copy what Liz wrote, scoped only to gender and presentation. If you can get Paizo to change the title of the messageboards thread, we can change the title on the reference, but I seriously hope the reference titles in the footnotes are not the confusing aspects of that part of the article. Otherwise it's best for maintaining reference links if titles hew as closely to their sources, since it's far easier to find web archives or new URLs via accurate titles if the Paizo site changes and breaks links. -Oznogon (talk) 17:22, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
- Ah, I see that now - the article was just titled wrongly and the link is just the post's title, sorry for not picking up on that lol it's quite obvious now, thank ya CaptainZulas (talk) 18:06, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
- I'm actually not sure this is canonical information. While Liz was the author of Reiko's "Meet the Iconics" blog, she was not a member of Paizo's editorial team, so her clarification on the message boards doesn't qualify as a Tier 0 source. Further, as was indicated in the message board thread, this is an apocryphal detail rather than something that's even remotely hinted at in the text itself. I think this is probably best left as a footnote on the discussion rather than part of the infobox itself, at least until there is an actual canonical source confirming this aspect of the character.— Yoda8myhead (talk) 19:39, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
- Ah, I see that now - the article was just titled wrongly and the link is just the post's title, sorry for not picking up on that lol it's quite obvious now, thank ya CaptainZulas (talk) 18:06, 28 June 2017 (UTC)