Template talk:Human ethnicities navbox

From PathfinderWiki

Major & Minor

Again I wonder about this subjective split. For now, I have retained the split between major and minor human ethnicities but, Casmars, for instance, may turn out to be very major at some point when that continent is turned to. Perhaps a single line is sufficient here? --Fleanetha (talk) 11:54, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

I'm of 2 minds. This kind of split is purely subjective, but it keeps the list from becoming too unwieldy. Even so, I'd default to a single line. Perhaps as more of Golarion is covered a split by continent of origin would make sense. Even now with all the Tian ethnicities it may help. -- FoiledAgain (talk) 14:45, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
That already sounds a better and more quantitative way of splitting them out, and future proofing it too, plus it is an in-world split that would be understood by a native of Golarion. I think the major / minor is simply to do with whether they appear in the ISWG or not - which is valid, but maybe not the best? While I am here - anyone know of some good artwork for the ethnicities that still don't have any? --Fleanetha (talk) 14:54, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
I like it, although perhaps it should be changed to "Continent of Origin", since many of the ethnicities live "abroad". --Brandingopportunity (talk) 17:08, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Well done. I got rid of the hard-coded spaces being used to widen the continent column. It was causing an odd appearance on mobile devices. Now it looks better across the browsers I was able to check it on. -- FoiledAgain (talk) 10:08, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Excellent feedback both - thank you and I'll note the tip for increasing column width for future use - very useful. --Fleanetha (talk) 17:34, 24 May 2013 (UTC)