Category talk:CR 0 creatures

Title?

The two initial creatures in this category actually have: CR —, not CR 0. This category probably should reflect that, as should the creature's pages. So: Category:CR — creatures. However, having a symbol in the category is a bit unfriendly, so am unsure. --Fleanetha (talk) 22:26, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

I would prefer to avoid symbols that might require encoding for some users, such as & mdash;, in categories. What about Category:Creatures with no CR? Or is that too ambiguous with creatures who don't have a listed mechanical CR or statblock? -Oznogon (talk) 22:39, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Yes, symbol is not right. Animal companions and familiars have CR — too, so while Category:Creatures with no CR is better, it may be ambiguous and that may be the point you were making. I see you have made the CR in the statblocks CR — which makes sense. Perhaps doing that and keeping Category:CR 0 creatures could be a good way forward. That's similar to how we treat environmental categories too. --Fleanetha (talk) 22:52, 12 November 2018 (UTC)