ISM suggests shadowcasters are a type of caster rather than an organization. What would that make them? A profession? —User:Oznogon (see also Talk:Isiem)
Tricky. ISM says shadowcasting is a type of magic and shadowcaster is a practitioner and is also a wizard archetype. I think we need to break the redirect from Shadowcasting as that topic has a page in ISM and is worthy of its own page and Cat:Magic adding to that. I like it as a profession and it also needs to be part of cat:wizards to cover the archetype. They need a Z-K affiliation too. Also I've removed Shadowcasters/members if it is not an org. That's a start - anything else? --Fleanetha (talk) 11:51, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
I'm not sure about the Category:Wizards; despite the mechanical archetype, ISM and Nightblade both say or demonstrate that shadowcasters can be other arcane spellcasters. The shadowcallers might fit in Cat:Wizards; Ascaros is an exception to the rule. Rest is fine by me. —Oznogon (talk) 23:34, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
