Category talk:Universe

Cat:Astronomy

I think this is needed - just removed - as Astronomy is the study of the Material Plane and everything in it. --Fleanetha (talk) 18:53, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

I disagree, as Category:Physics, Category:Chemistry, Category:Biology, Category:Mathematics, Category:Philosophies, etc. all have equal claims to it. I can't come up with a scenario where someone looking for Category:Material Plane would find it in the category tree by first going to Category:Sciences, then Category:Astronomy—what's the value of putting Category:Material Plane under the subcategory of a subcategory of Category:Sciences? -Oznogon (talk) 07:11, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Those categories can all have it as well Oznogon. You have just spent a lot of time moving the contents of the Material Plane into Astronomy, so why is it a problem that the overall entity is there too? Plus, as above, Astronomy is the study of the Material Plane and everything in it, so it should be in there. --Fleanetha (talk) 17:35, 11 January 2016 (UTC)