PathfinderWiki talk:Point of view
This seems pretty straight forward to me. If we're voting, I say we go ahead and make this a policy.--Aeakett 19:20, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, the lack of discussion on the topic means that either everyone's ok with it or the community at large is ambivalent enough to not have noticed it or not care in the first place. Since we've been picking up momentum recently, let's see if this discussion goes anywhere. If we don't have any objections or an ongoing discussion regarding proposed changes by Friday night, I say yes to making it official. That said, we link and refer to the Manual of style several times on this page. Perhaps this is something else we should consider making? I adapted the POV policy from Memory Alpha, but their MoS wasn't really applicable to our uses. --yoda8myhead 23:14, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Maybe we could undertake to pare down Wikipedia's MoS for our use. Even if we just used that as a starting point, we could then add sections to deal with stuff specific to us? --Aeakett 23:42, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Sounds good to me. I might have time to tackle that this weekend, but can't promise it.--yoda8myhead 23:56, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Maybe we could undertake to pare down Wikipedia's MoS for our use. Even if we just used that as a starting point, we could then add sections to deal with stuff specific to us? --Aeakett 23:42, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
Proposal changed to policy by yoda8myhead 19:30, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
Meta included
Logging for posterity; added the Meta namespace, which contains progress boxes, inclusion initiative progress, and unincorporated sources lists, as a non-canon namespace for PoV purposes. -Oznogon (talk) 21:01, 14 January 2024 (UTC)