Talk:4438 AR

Hmm, agreed environment is not right, Brandingopportunity, but marsh giants are pretty scary wildlife. People, migrations or misc might be better?--Fleanetha (talk) 18:47, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Misc is probably the best then, since I guess marsh giants are not exactly wildlife. Then again, we've been putting dragon sightings under wildlife, and they're a heck of a lot smarter than giants. I guess we're showing our humanoid-centric tendencies, eh? Perhaps we should reconsider the entire category? --Brandingopportunity (talk) 18:55, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Definitely agreed; dragons are not wildlife. --Fleanetha (talk) 19:06, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Hmm, well, the majority of the entries under this template are about dragons. So perhaps we could change the name (and color, the green is godawful) of the template to something that could include dragons, giants, and the Spawn of Rovagug? Perhaps something like {{Yearbox/in-monsters}} or {{Yearbox/in-creatures}}? --Brandingopportunity (talk) 19:20, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Both are better suggestions. Green is good for wildlife though, if not for monsters or am I showing Temperate climate-centric tendencies?--Fleanetha (talk) 19:34, 8 August 2012 (UTC)