Talk:Charnel colossus

Colossus, or not?

It doesn't have the colossus subtype, but it predates the subtype's introduction. However, it's also an intelligent undead instead of a construct. Anyone have a strong belief that it should be included with the other colossi? -Oznogon (talk) 23:24, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

I'd say no to inclusion. In addition to your points above, Bestiary 4 has "All colossi have two forms" and each one has an "Alternate form" listed in its crunch. A charnel colossus has neither. I think the only connection is the naming and your navbox is for the type of creature introduced in B4 so I think I'd remove that from this page too. A disambiguation might work to connect this beast with the constructs so someone searching is clear we have considered this. --Fleanetha (talk) 12:31, 18 October 2015 (UTC)