Talk:Faultspawn

Consistency of naming

Brandingopportunity, I want to move this page to Asura-spawn and leave a redirect from 'faultspawn' to asura-spawn. In Blood of Fiends, that way round seems to be the primary / secondary nomenclature used for this type of tiefling and all the others. I want to set the others that way too with an 'x-spawn' page and a redirect to it from the secondary term. However, you chose the other way round for a reason, and I trust your judgement: I'd like to understand that before I start please. --Fleanetha 20:15, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

I havn't gotten around to Blood of Fiends yet in my reading, but is it put that way as more of a for the ease of DMs, or is it used as if they are called Asura-spawn in world? -- Cpt kirstov 21:49, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

I'm guessing that since the "blank-spawn" term is listed first, it should be the primary (i.e. article) name. I've also done a search among other Paizo publications, and it looks like these terms are used more than others; so we'll go with those. --Brandingopportunity 05:13, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks both; your search was a useful check as the authors use faultspawn, or its equivalent, in the Blood of Fiends text despite prioritising asura-spawn in the title: odd. So we go with x-spawn (with small s!) for now.--Fleanetha (talk) 15:23, 27 July 2012 (UTC)