Talk:Glorio Arkona

Proposal to move [CONCLUDED]

Please discuss the proposed move here. -Oznogon (talk) 20:14, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

I'll start one. If Bahor becomes the primary article name and Glorio Arkona is the redirect, the spoiler becomes unavoidable-the name itself is the spoiler. I think this is sufficient to be an exception to our naming conventions unless there's some agreement that the spoiler is no longer a concern. -Oznogon (talk) 19:30, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

We have spoiler conversations in a number of places now + Discord. I'll set up a discussion area on the Forum, I think, to pull things together. --Fleanetha (talk) 18:36, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

I agree with Oznogon. Bahor should redirect to Glorio. The spoiler is still a concern. New people come into the hobby all the time and will play Curse of the Crimson Throne. Also, in in-world terms, the overwhelming majority of people in Korvosa know him as Glorio, so that name should carry some weight. We're also not dealing with a "Darth Vader is Luke's father" situation here, where anyone over the age of 8 is aware of the spoiler. Only people who have read or played through the AP know this information. --Brandingopportunity (talk) 22:43, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Worth noting: related PathfinderWiki talk:Naming conventions and PathfinderWiki talk:Canon policy proposals on redirects and true names. -Oznogon (talk) 00:15, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

There is art for this character which I have added to the page, but commented out for now, as it is a rather large spoiler in itself. When this is resolved, we can decide what to do with it. --Fleanetha (talk) 22:29, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

With the update to the spoiler policy about redirects, this debate is concluded and the page and art are now as they should be under the new policy. --Fleanetha (talk) 16:33, 5 December 2019 (UTC)