Talk:Rot grub

So do I call the article for the giant rot grub "Rot grub, giant" or "Giant rot grub"? --brandingopportunity 03:28, September 12, 2009 (UTC)

uh...dunno. Take a look at how we did Giant fly? That's also got the giant grub in the same article. This might be a case of doing several versions on a single article. -- yoda8myhead 04:13, September 12, 2009 (UTC)

OK, the only issue with including stuff within the article is that the giant rot grub has different stats, so that the CR in the infobox would only reflect one version of the critter. --brandingopportunity 15:24, September 12, 2009 (UTC)

I wasn't looking at the stats when I suggested that, so do a different article on each one. -- yoda8myhead 17:21, September 12, 2009 (UTC)

Copied from Talk:Giant rot grub

OK, we now have both "Giant rot grub" and "Stymphalides, giant". Which naming convention should we use? --brandingopportunity 13:53, October 2, 2009 (UTC)

The former has been our method thus far. Since we can alphabetize articles by different parameters than their article name, using commas for following descriptors is unnecessary and archaic. -- yoda8myhead 15:45, October 2, 2009 (UTC)

Copied here as Giant rot grub has been deleted. --Fleanetha (talk) 14:46, 2 January 2013 (UTC)