Template talk:See
I feel the output from this template is little distinguished from normal text and could get lost. Can this template be adapted please so that the text output is italicized and indented in a similar fashion to {{See also}}? Differences shown here with the examples of Absalom and Abyss:
--Fleanetha (talk) 18:30, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
- It's probably easiest just to merge the two and have {{see}} redirect to {{See also}}, which, I agree, is a better template visually and they serve the same purpose. —
Yoda8myhead (talk) 23:59, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
- That seems reasonable, unless there is a semantic difference I can't currently fathom. For giggles, I checked out Wikipedia for an example of how they handled this and it's such a mess, standardizing on one method/template looks like a winner. However, the requested change was easy enough I just did it in case we decide to keep this as a unique template. --FoiledAgain (talk) 05:53, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you FoiledAgain for making the change. On reflection I agree with you two and am also not convinced we need two ways of effectively saying the same thing either. Looking at the docs there are even more templates that do similar things which we do not have, so reference to them might as well also be deleted from our pages. {{See also}} looks like the best candidate to keep with its shiny new PathfinderWiki-related doc page. --Fleanetha (talk) 10:54, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
- That seems reasonable, unless there is a semantic difference I can't currently fathom. For giggles, I checked out Wikipedia for an example of how they handled this and it's such a mess, standardizing on one method/template looks like a winner. However, the requested change was easy enough I just did it in case we decide to keep this as a unique template. --FoiledAgain (talk) 05:53, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
