Talk:Apocalypse Riders

CSII [Comments superseded by ISWGII]

Should this page be marked as complete in the CSII list? One of the four horsemen doesn't even have an article yet, and the CS definitely provides enough info to at least make a stub with an infobox and proper categorization. This is the sort of thing that should be included in any CSII effort, because if it's not done when doing this article, it'll get overlooked. --yoda8myhead 21:40, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

I don't think it should be marked as complete at this point. In addition to the fourth horseman's information being absent, the article itself lacks citation. -- Heaven's Agent 00:05, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Hey, what the... How did my name get on the CSII header for this article? I don't even see in the article history where the header got added. Anyway, I'd be happy to take responsibility for this section, as long as everyone is OK with my glacial pace of writing. --Aeakett 12:04, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

The header was part of the initial edit; it was most likely just copied from another article, without realization that it would need changed. In any case, have at the article if you'd like and don't worry about your pace. I've made what, tree edits toward the CSII effort? Your glacier's outdistancing me by a fair bit. ;D -- Heaven's Agent 16:09, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Infobox

Should this article be using the {{creature}} infobox? I can't think of a better one, but this doesn't seem to fit quite right. I know it is also used on the Demon lord page. I think we may be able to remove them altogether or create a custom infobox for each one without using a template, since the information presented in them is unique. --yoda8myhead 00:10, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

I added a Deity box as the primary box - that seems more appropriate plus updated the Creature one--Fleanetha 18:36, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Duplicate information [Some done and superseded by Update section below]

This page is in need of some work especially in the light of more recent sourcebooks. I'll just add refs for now.

One immediate change to consider is the removal of one of the sources as we have two currently: this one and another here: Daemon. I think that data should be here and a simple link from daemon. Is there a reason for the split historically?

I also do not think the Creature template is appropriate as they are more like demigods having similar power to demon lords (I cannot find a ref for this yet though). I don't think demon lords should have a creature template either as they area all unique. A deity box might be more appropriate as boxes are nice summaries.--Fleanetha 00:06, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

I think that this came up earlier at some point... the diety template was to be only dead dieties and things that grant domains. (Also Deities arn't going to get stat blocks, and James has talked about the fact that the four horsemen are most likly around CR 25-28) -- Cpt kirstov 05:08, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

I've tidied up the issue of two pages with info by combining it all here. There was no real duplication so all preserved.--Fleanetha 21:32, 23 January 2011 (UTC)