Log in


From PathfinderWiki
← $1

Age of fiends

Statement in the wiki page suggests Daemons are younger than demons, yet a Horseman (a daemon) was responsible for the genesis of demons.--Fleanetha 21:16, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Is it possible that the two are not mutually exclusive? what if before Lamashtu stolen the process for creating demons, there were only the horsemen for daemons, and there was no daemon race, only a horsemen race, but perhaps Lamashtu's first few attempts wrought Deamons instead of deamons, and they sided with the horsemen and became more like them.... (none of what I just wrote was cannon, and I havn't read up on the horsemen/deamon relationship in the material other than whats on the pages here... but its a thought that came into my head at 3am EST after reading your comment above -- Cpt kirstov 08:06, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
Per James herethis is incorrect. Unless someone has objections, I will change it on Monday. - Cpt kirstov 12:01, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
So changed. That daemons created demons is confirmed on p. 27 of Horsemen of the Apocalypse, although it is not stated whether daemons are older than devils. --Brandingopportunity 15:46, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
Should it then be changed to ". . . among the youngest of the fiendish races, though they came into existence before demons?" Canifis (talk) 01:54, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Flagging as officially resolved per the James Jacobs post. -Oznogon (talk) 00:57, 20 November 2018 (UTC)