Talk:Daidian Ruel/Conflicts

Name spelling

The Bastards of Erebus p 58 lists his name as Daidian Ruhl. This alternate spelling redirects to the main article at Daidian Ruel.—yoda8myhead 06:52, September 3, 2010 (UTC)

What Lies in Dust p.61 has a quote from his "Merciless" address to Gaspodar's Court at the start of the Hellknights article and lists his name as "Daidian Reis" Takeyabue 20:54, September 4, 2010 (UTC)

Founding year

4576 AR cites the Campaign Setting to say that the Order of the Rack was founded then; This page cites The Bastards of Erebus to say it was founded in 3577 AR. --Goblin Witchlord 19:48, September 11, 2009 (UTC)

This is a typo I think the Westcrown: City of Twilight article refers to the Hellknights first conquest (Taranik House p58) in 4577. I guess the order was founded in the year previous which would put it in line with the campaign setting. I will correct - Manannan 19:58, September 11, 2009 (UTC)

The 4576 AR date is the correct one. --brandingopportunity 20:03, September 11, 2009 (UTC)

Based on the canon hierarchy, both sources hold the same merit. Please follow canon policy regarding conflicting sources when making fixes to this discrepancy on this or any other article. -- yoda8myhead 20:06, September 11, 2009 (UTC)

I don't believe there is a conflict here but I have recinded my changes. - Manannan 20:15, September 11, 2009 (UTC)

I think there is a conflict here, unless I've missed something. It's not a big deal if there is, which is why we have policies in place to handle such a situation. We can ask for clarification on the issue on the Paizo boards if you feel that is necessary. Such clarification would serve as Tier 0 canon, but a note of the discrepancy between the two Tier 1 sources should still be noted. -- yoda8myhead 20:18, September 11, 2009 (UTC)