Talk:Escadar

Conflict?

The article, citing the Campaign Setting, lists Escadar's governing body as the Lesser Council. Guide to Absalom (p.11-12) names the body the Low Council, but doesn't discuss it directly. --Goblin Witchlord 03:57, September 13, 2009 (UTC)

It appears this is yet another case of GtA being victim of a terrible development process. Again, note the discrepancy using {{conflict}} and disregard the lower-tiered source in the article itself.

We're seeing a lot of these conflicts between sources and you're only on page 12 of GtA. I will look through the Paizo boards for an errata thread for the book which should serve to answer some of the more glaring discrepancies using the Tier 0 source of the Pathfinder editors' own posts. I will post a link to such a thread in the book's talk page-- yoda8myhead 06:22, September 13, 2009 (UTC)

Hm. There may be no conflict. GtA refers merely to the "Low Council" in the Escadar section without naming it as the "ruler". It may refer to the Low Council of Absalom which is (p. 46) a section of the Grand Council and known both as the "Low Council" and the "Lesser Council". I'll have to read further. --Goblin Witchlord 06:36, September 13, 2009 (UTC)