Talk:Inuliak

Move consideration [COMPLETED]

In the light of the spoiler conversation still undergoing, I am testing whether this is an example of a page that should be written on its alias' page as per PathfinderWiki talk:Spoilers. Here the alias and the real name are both little known as this character appears as a supplemental idea in Pathfinder 100. However, the redirect does direct straight to a page with spoilers so the arguments made in the spoiler page are relevant. --Fleanetha (talk) 14:42, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

As the person that wrote the page, I put the spoiler badge here because it mentions Anamurumon's schemes (which shouldn't be read by those who intend to play The Empty Throne). As far as I'm concerned, the character's real name isn't a spoiler, since he is only a supplemental idea and doesn't actually appear in the AP. - HTD (talk) 23:19, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Reconsidering this after the policy change above has been accepted, I think we'll align this page with the new policy. Although it is a supplemental idea for the AP in question, if a GM decides to use it, the wiki needlessly spoils for the players. This is easily surmounted with reversing the redirect. --Fleanetha (talk) 16:19, 5 December 2019 (UTC)