Talk:Yivali

Potentially unreliable

Per the events of Destroyer's Doom and its supporting articles, Yivali was wrong about the destruction of at least Dretha and Zagresh. Text written in Yivali's point of view might need to be described as such, as if she were an unreliable source. -Oznogon (talk) 22:00, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Talk:Covenant/Conflicts presents another conflict in which part of a Yivali-authored chapter of Divine Mysteries is seemingly overridden by an objective prior section of rules content in the same work. -Oznogon (talk) 17:33, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Talk:Sarenrae/Conflicts notes that Yivali asserts that Sarenrae is not one of the first deities of existence, and ascended to divinity from the status of an angelic empyreal lord only after the binding of Rovagug. -Oznogon (talk) 00:49, 25 March 2025 (UTC)