User talk:GregT 314
Welcome to PathfinderWiki! We hope you will contribute as much as you are able and that you find the community welcoming and helpful.
If you have any questions, please:
- View our tutorial
- View our quick wiki-editing reference and help pages
- Join our conversation in the Discord chat
- Contact an administrator
If you want a place to start contributing, check our ongoing projects.
PathfinderWiki has a number of policies and guidelines to help editors maintain the wiki's high level of quality. For style and formatting guidelines, please see our manual of style. Also, please note that PathfinderWiki might contain spoilers for the Pathfinder campaign setting. Finally, please don't directly copy-and-paste from Paizo publications, as this is simply not allowed: PathfinderWiki:Plagiarism.
Again, welcome and have fun! — Fleanetha (talk) 08:59, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for engaging so quickly, GregT 314. I am diving in quickly as I spotted you are lifting chunks of text straight from the sources, which is against the PathfinderWiki:Plagiarism rules we have to have to keep us sweet with Paizo. Please take a look and see if you can write the text you've written in your own way instead. Thanks. --Fleanetha (talk) 13:32, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
pfs parameter in adventure overview templates
Looks like a misguided automated replacement of links to Pathfinder Society Organized Play with links to Pathfinder Society (second edition) made the {{Adventure overview}} documentation suggest the pfs parameter was only for 2E scenarios. It is not, and removing it breaks categorization by level tier, such as Category:Tier 1-5 scenarios. I've fixed that inappropriately replaced link, and others.
Please do not remove the pfs parameter from further scenario articles. -Oznogon (talk) 06:12, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- No worries, I was going off the template explanation which, as you say, at the time said that PFS should only be used for 2E scenarios. (And when I was originally editing Silent Tide the template had some additional nonsense "faction" information in it that clearly didn't apply to that scenario, so I assumed the template might be broken generally for early modules.) I'll leave the PFS in place in future. - GregT 314 (talk) 00:47, 14 January 2025 (UTC)