Category talk:Riddleport crimelords

From PathfinderWiki

What should this category be then?

Moved from Category talk:Riddleport/Crime lords

It is needed and this is at least a consistent consolidation of the grouping but the solidus is unusual and a non-standard use, plus Shadow in the Sky uses 'crimelords' consistently. Is 'Riddleport crimelords' an organization in its own right? Then that could be an org and we could have 'Riddleport crimelords/Members'. If not, then more simply we could just use Cat:Riddleport crimelords. --Fleanetha (talk) 01:35, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

I'd say either Category:Riddleport crimelords, or simply the combination of Category:Riddleport/Inhabitants and Category:Crimelords under Category:Inhabitants by occupation, since there are crimelords in several places. Crime in Korvosa, for instance, has a section named "Crimelords". -Oznogon (talk) 05:01, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
I prefer Category:Riddleport crimelords too - I think they are so important in Riddleport being part of the 'government' that they deserve a special mention. However, I also like your suggestion of Category:Crimelords as a generic term under Category:Inhabitants by occupation to pick up the others. Category:Riddleport crimelords can then be a subcategory of Category:Crimelords. --Fleanetha (talk) 13:45, 24 December 2015 (UTC)