Talk:Arcane archer

From PathfinderWiki

RfM

The PF2E APG retconned "arcane archers" to be one of the four traditions of eldritch archers. May I move this article accordingly? -edit summary of revision 539968 by Descriptivist on 04:06, 22 November 2024

I see no suggestion in Advanced Player's Guide of a retroactive change relevant to canon. The archetype shares key abilities, but the default assumption is that no conflict exists. I cannot find an official clarification suggesting this change is retroactive.
No NPCs or creatures are eldritch archers. Additionally, Heroes of the Streets 11 has a magus archetype named "eldritch archer", and no NPCs or creatures are that type of eldritch archer either. The canon relevance of such a change is at best none and at worst confusing.
If consensus suggests that moving this article is appropriate, affected arcane archers I can find include:
The Category:Arcane archers categories would either need renaming or reconciliation with the change.
Additionally, I removed this unnecessary footnote:
According to the OGL rulebooks Advanced Player's Guide (Second Edition) and Core Rulebook (First Edition), elves first developed eldritch archery (arcane archery1E) as a martial art. The Pathfinder Remaster rulebook Player Core 2, published under the ORC License, does not mention an elven tradition of eldritch archery.
This is irrelevant barring an official clarification that the Remaster retroactively changed the canon status of that sidebar.
-Oznogon (talk) 00:54, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Maybe make a separate eldritch archer page now; redo this page as pure arcane archer; add {{See also}} to mutually associate each page; leave the talk page as it is here, but reference it at the new eldritch archer talk page; then, wait and see if we get any official ruling? Until then, everything is nicely connected with no assumptions made. --Fleanetha (talk) 06:36, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
I agree with this compromise. -Oznogon (talk) 17:16, 12 December 2024 (UTC)