Talk:Mhar

From PathfinderWiki

Recent deletion

Hi User:Filby, at first sight what you deleted here looks canon and is referenced - probably worth a discussion before a deletion like this is made. Why do you think it is non-canon? --Fleanetha (talk) 20:28, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

It's an event that occurs within an adventure, specifically Spires of Xin-Shalast. As per James Jacobs: "No Adventure Path is canon except with respect to itself. (The only exception being Shattered Star, which assumes Rise of the Runelords, Curse of the Crimson Throne, and Second Darkness have all taken place.)" My apologies for not leaving a note explaining my reasoning.--Filby (talk) 21:26, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
Filby, on this subject we do don't follow Paizo's lead, but have our own canon policy (see PathfinderWiki:Canon_policy). This has not been discussed here in quite some time, but PathfinderWiki presumes that the events in the various adventure paths, modules, Pathfinder Society scenarios, etc, have, in fact happened. This was decided early on, and has, as far as I know, not been changed. The events in Spires of Xin-Shalast have therefore occurred as the article originally stated. --Brandingopportunity (talk) 21:39, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
I see. In that case I'll revert my edit.--Filby (talk) 21:47, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
Also, Shattered Star assumes the first 3 adventure pathes have happened as well... as does Lost cities of Golarion when it included Xin-Shalast-- Cpt kirstov (talk) 23:05, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Spoilers

Now that I have Rise of New Thassilon on hand, I can't see why this article could be a spoiler for that adventure. Outside of the 2 pages in the bestiary, there's no mention of Mhar at all in the book. Would anyone object if the spoiler notice for Rise of New Thassilon is removed? - HTD (talk) 15:51, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

I would not. Good catch, and thanks for seeking community consensus before making the change.—Paizo Publishing, LLC.png Yoda8myhead (talk) 20:34, 7 February 2019 (UTC)