Log in

PathfinderWiki talk:Nocticula Revision Initiative

From PathfinderWiki
← $1


Timestamping the kickoff of this initiative. Please use this page for project-wide discussions, and Talk pages of individual articles for discussions specific to them. (Article-specific discussions that start here might get moved.) -Oznogon (talk) 20:01, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Policy update

We should probably include a discussion on defining the wiki policy for major canon updates like Nocticula: they only happen once we have "proof" that they are indeed permanent in subsequent publications. This mostly has to do with APs updating the "base canon" of the setting. We should also note in this discussion that the "base canon" will be wholly updated once Pathfinder 2: Electric Boogaloo is released. --Brandingopportunity (talk) 01:22, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Since there's already been some off-wiki discussion about this particular subject, I'll defer to Yoda8myhead. I do agree that the spoiler policy could be clearer on this point going forward, one way or another, though that might be best raised on its talk page. -Oznogon (talk) 01:38, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
No activity here in a couple of weeks—I'll bump to the wiki forums. -Oznogon (talk) 20:47, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
HTD, Fleanetha, anything? Seemed like this was a hot topic of discussion not long ago. -Oznogon (talk) 16:54, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
Forgive me Oznogon, I thought I had been warned off this to avoid major spoilers, so I have actively been avoiding it. What would you like my help with here? --Fleanetha (talk) 10:01, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
For the purposes of BrOp's question on canon updates, clarity of the canon policy around major setting changes -Oznogon (talk) 18:12, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
I'm starting to think that this topic might not be as big of a spoiler for Return of the Runelords as initially thought. The only thing that Runeplague does is giving the confirmation that the ascension happened (offscreen, some time before the AP began or shortly after it did; in any case, the PCs of Return of the Runelords have nothing to do with it). - HTD (talk) 12:37, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
It doesn't have to be impactful to the AP's plot to constitute a spoiler. This is a wide-ranging setting change that right now occurs in only a single AP that hasn't finished. I'm not inclined to move away from labeling it as such. -Oznogon (talk) 18:12, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Needs resolution of discussions on PathfinderWiki talk:Spoilers, specifically the proposal to define "major spoiler". I've copied Brandingopportunity's statement to Project talk:Canon policy. -Oznogon (talk) 18:17, 20 January 2019 (UTC)