Template talk:Pathfinder lodges navbox

From PathfinderWiki

Answered questions

A Start

This is a difficult subject and I'd appreciate a review of this navbox please: changing and variant names for the lodges. I think I have captured all from Pathfinder Society Primer and Seekers of Secrets and I have suggested a standardized naming convention for lodges that do not have a specific name. What is missed? Are my assumptions correct? --Fleanetha (talk) 01:16, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Unless a lodge is specifically called out as having a different name (like "Grand Lodge" or "Sandswept Hall") it is generally just referred to as the "XXLocation Lodge." Thus, the lodge in Kalabuto would be the Kalabuto Lodge. This is the naming convention we use in printed products.—Paizo Publishing, LLC.png Yoda8myhead (talk) 21:10, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
I've gone ahead and renamed the lodges in this navbox. I further propose that, rather than list lodges by active status (resulting in two of three groups containing only one or two entries) we group them by continent, and denote with [Inactive] those two lodges who fit that criteria. I've talked with John about this and we're both of the same mind that whenever possible, we should endeavor to officially name as many of the lodges as we can (similar to how we gave Sandswept Hall a name six years after it was first referenced), so the wiki should just use the XXLocation Lodge convention until such names are designated in canon.—Paizo Publishing, LLC.png Yoda8myhead (talk) 21:45, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
Brilliant - thanks for checking this for us Yoda8myhead. I'll attend to the list shortly to tidy it up and I like your suggested improvement. If you have a spare moment, could you ask about the Vodavani Lodge in Caliphas please: there is a story there I am sure (see note on that page).--Fleanetha (talk) 12:14, 14 October 2013 (UTC)